The Great Emojis in Marketing Debate, Passive Words Ruin Thought Leadership, & Twitter Unveils Massive Redesign to Users ...This Is THE LATEST!
💯 Jump Right into the Good Stuff!
Get your ticket to IMPACT Live 2019. You won't want to miss out on this one-of-a-kind, immersive event for growth-focused business leaders and digital marketers. Use code IMPACT20 to take 20% off your ticket price.
I should be exclusively focusing on finishing my IMPACT Live talk right now, since my slides are due in three days. (I'm not panicking, you're panicking.) But I'm going to be irresponsible and talk about something completely different instead.
As digital marketers and business leaders, we're no stranger to "heated debates" about different topics in our industry:
"If you don't want to be taken seriously in your marketing, go ahead — use emojis."
"What are you talking about?! Emojis get results. Period."
"Twitter is a useless social media platform and a waste of time."
"WRONG! Twitter is where news happens; brands need to pay attention!"
But if you want to see absolute anarchy, lob a somewhat controversial editorial style topic (e.g., the Oxford Comma) in front of a bunch of agency content managers and editors. It won't be long before those seemingly teamwork-focused marketing pros devolve into territorial, bloodthirsty warriors.
For example, one of the editors from AP Stylebook (from which we derive the vast majority of our own editorial style rules at IMPACT) recently conducted an "Ask Me Anything!" session on Reddit:
On the whole, most of the questions were fairly innocuous. But you didn't need to scroll far to see some serious "Hatfield vs. McCoy"-level of angst coming through:
AP Stylebook, the choice of blasphemers?
Eesh.
Of course, I had to share this glorious gold mine of editorial insight and tribal warfare with my fellow IMPACT content nerds, Stephanie, John, and Jen.
And it wasn't long before they began to turn on each other.
Am I a monster who just wants to watch the world burn? Maybe. 😈
In reality, however, I love working at a company that hires ridiculously smart people who come from diverse backgrounds and don't always agree. I think that's the way it should be, though. Some of the best ideas and strategies we've devised were born out of disagreements, and (personally) I like being challenged to back up my beliefs.
Plus, think about how dull all of our jobs would be if everyone always agreed, no one fought passionately for their ideas, and everything stayed the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.